轉自東吳機研部品板
有板友找到發表原文的教授
也取得回應並同意公開此段回信:p
都是原文，看得懂的就看
不想看英文的
結論我直接告訴大家，原教授同意全罩式是優於半罩or3/4(open face)
"I believe that full-faced helmets are better than open helmets."
----
楊博士已同意在所有區域公開其回應
但是為求謹慎 請各位轉錄時 請把全文轉錄
由於是回應我的信件 懇請各位一併把我的信件附上 把過程全部呈現
以下是全文
From: wisey@pipeline.com
To: darsting@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: about full-face motorcycle helmets, response from Taiwan
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:48:15 -0500
Can you please give me the URL for what I was supposed to have said.
I don't recall saying that full-faced motorcycle helmets
are more dangerous than open-faced ones.
I may have been misinterpreted or misquoted.
I remember talking to a reporter in Taiwan about how modern helmets
have higher backs and that this is a good because it reduces
the risk of spinal cord injury.
I was referring only to the rear and praised this development.
I believe that full-faced helmets are better than open helmets.
Wise.
我的再回覆
Hi, I didn't expect that you replied so soon.
I have to apologize for misunderstanding you.
Our reporters did not do their job well and
made her report being misleading and let you take the heat.
There has been so many mortorcyclist saying sth bad about you.
I will explaine your reply to them on the bbs or other websites.
Is it ok that I post your reply on those bbs systems or websites?
Here is the link of the article.
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/071218/4/q48y.html
Sorry, I shouldn't say 'your article'. It's a report of our reporters.
Dustin Wu.
楊的再回覆
Yes, you may quote me.
Wise.
別再隨瞎掰一通的記者起舞了....
[ 本文章最後由 wildspirit 於 2010-9-21 20:17 編輯 ] |
42
11662
